Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 251 F.2d 97 - Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. v. Yellow Transit Freight Lines, Inc.

Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. v. Yellow Transit Freight Lines, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

251 F.2d 97 · 1957

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
3
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably United Air Lines, Inc. v. Wiener (1964), Security Insurance v. Johnson (1960)

21 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

14019571960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Standard Oil Co. · Builders Supply Co. v. McCabe · George's Radio, Inc. v. Capital Transit Co. · Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Compania Transatlantica Espanola · Insurance Company v. Brame

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) An injured worker must elect which liability to pursue first, whether to take compensation under the Act or pursue his remedy against the third party; (2) An injured employee who files a claim for compensation must assign the cause of action against the third party defendant to the employers insurance carrier; (3) If the worker elects to proceed against the third party the employer’s carrier shall contribute only a deficiency, if any, between the amount of recovery against such other person actually collected, and the compensation provided or estimated by the Workers’ Compensation Act; and, (4) Any compromise of a cause of action by the worker for an amount less than the compensation provided by the Workers’ Compensation Act shall be made only with the written approval of the Workers’ Compensation Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"* * * Indemnity is a right which enures to a person who has discharged a duty which is owed by him but which as between himself and another should have been discharged by the other. It implies a primary liability in one person, although a second person is also liable to a third party. Some benefit must have accrued to the indemnitor, the person primarily liable. goose oe»”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The purpose of this section is to prevent a double recovery by the injured employee.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.