Manuel Baralt’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
21 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably Velzquez-Fernndez v. Nce Foods Inc "A" "J", 257 F. Supp. 2d 454 - Varela Teron v. Banco Santander De Puerto Rico (2003)
21 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Suarez v. Pueblo International, Inc. · Maria Feliciano De La Cruz Erasmo Jimenez and Their Conjugal Partnership El Conquistador Resort and Country Club and Hugh Andrews · Vega v. Kodak Caribbean, Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that he was at least forty years old when he and his employer parted company; (2) that his job performance met the employer’s legitimate expectations; (3) that he lost his position through an adverse employment action attributable to the employer (typically, a firing); and , (4) that the employer had a Continuing need for the services that he had been rendering.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“proffered sufficient admissible evidence, if believed, to prove by a preponderance of the evidence . . . that the employer's justification . . . was merely a pretext for impermissible age discrimination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) demonstrating that he was actually or constructively discharged, and (2) alleging that the decision was discriminatory.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.