Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 251 F.3d 1252 - Clicks Billiards Inc Texas Corporation v. Sixshooters Inc an Arizona Corporation

Clicks Billiards Inc Texas Corporation v. Sixshooters Inc an Arizona Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

251 F.3d 1252 · 2001

Citation profile

269
cited by 269 later decisions
August 2024
most recently cited

68 federal appellate · 58 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 269 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Orr v. Bank of America, NT & SA (2002), Oliver v. Keller (2002)

68 federal appellate · 58 district ·

1590200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc. · Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co. · Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc. · TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc. · Transgo, Inc. v. Ajac Transmission Parts Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 269 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Once the survey is admitted, however, follow-on issues of methodology, survey design, reliability, the experience and reputation of the expert, critique of conclusions, and the like go to the weight of the survey rather than its admissibility.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Treatment of surveys is a two-step process. First, is the survey admissible? That is, is there a proper foundation for admissibility, and is it relevant and conducted according to accepted principles? This threshold question may be determined by the judge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the total image of a product and may include features such as size, shape, color or color combination, texture, graphics, or even particular sales techniques.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.