Moore v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
251 F.3d 919 · 2001
Citation profile
77 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 114 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably Ngarurih v. Ashcroft (2004), Gonzalez-Oropeza v. U.S. Attorney General (2003)
77 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 656 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1105A (§ 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Delgado · Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp. · Kleindienst v. Mandel · Tapia Garcia v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Ricardo Lara-Ruiz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 114 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is (1) an alien; (2) who is removable; (3) based on having committed a disqualifying offense.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“any similar language removing federal review jurisdiction in the event an alien departs or is removed”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[n]o waiver shall be granted under this subsection in the case of an alien who has previously been admitted to the United States as an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence if either since the date of such admission the alien has been convicted of an aggravated felony or the alien has not lawfully resided continuously in the United States for a period of not less than 7 years immediately preceding the date of initiation of proceedings to remove the alien from the United States.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.