Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 251 ILL 603 - Bevans v. Murray

Bevans v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
8
states following
May 1991
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently May 1991 · most notably Vincent v. Rix (1928), Burke v. Burke (1913)

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 38 state decisions

140191119201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carpenter v. Strange · Phelps v. McDonald · Hayes v. O'Brien · John Lewis v. Sarah Darling · Parsons v. Millar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where the relief sought could be effected by acting directly upon the person of the defendant, the court of chancery has never hesitated to entertain the bill where the defendant is found within its jurisdiction, whether the subject matter of the controversy be within its control or not. Of this character are those cases where the courts have compelled specific performances of contracts for the conveyance of or relating to land which is situate beyond its jurisdiction, and in such case the court will compel a conveyance to be executed in such manner and form as may be prescribed by the laws of the country where the land is situate....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The decree in such cases settles the rights of the parties before the court with respect to some contract, conveyance, trust or fraudulent conduct, and by attachment or other coercive means compels the offending party to comply with the requirements of the decree or simply declares the transaction complained of void, and thereby removes an obstruction to the enforcement of his legal remedies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.