Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 251 Ind. 428 - CARPENTER v. State

CARPENTER v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
February 1979
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 111 Ind. App. 128 - State v. Schaller · 120 Ind. App. 279 - Romey v. Glass · 84 Ind. App. 646 - Speck v. Kramer · Belk v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We do not here pass upon the validity of a polygraph test because we do not believe it incumbent upon us to make that legal judgment at this time. However, we must conclude that a polygraph test, the same as any other scientific evidence, certainly can only be presented by the technician presenting testimony before the court with all counsel present as well as the defendants present. The defendants, by their counsel, certainly should have the right to examine the technician concerning the validity of the test; the questions propounded during the test; the technician’s training; and all other matters pertinent to the validity of any scientific investigation.” Carpenter v. State (1968), 251 Ind. 428, 431 , 241 N. E. 2d 347 , 15 Ind. Dec. 724 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.