Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 251 Ind. 448 - Davison v. Williams

Davison v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
2
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 62 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Thornton Ex Rel. Thornton v. Pender (1978), Bixenman v. Hall (1968)

6 federal appellate · 62 state decisions

380196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Alarid v. Vanier · Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School District · Larkins v. Kohlmeyer · Taylor v. Fitzpatrick · People v. . Wendel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where a person has disobeyed a statute he may excuse or justify the violation in a civil action for negligence by sustaining the burden of showing that he did what might reasonably be expected of a person of ordinary prudence, acting under similar circumstances, who desired to comply with the law.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'A mandatory instruction is one which unequivocally charges the jury that if they find from a preponderance of the evidence that a certain set of facts exists, they must render a verdict in accordance therewith either for the plaintiff or defendant' 2 Wiltrout, Indiana Practice, § 1400(8), p. 344 (1967)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““We believe that the wisest course for the courts of Indiana to take in adjudication of a suit involving negligence by a violation of a safety regulation is to treat plaintiff’s proof of defendant’s violation of the safety regulation as creating a rebuttable presumption of negligence.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.