Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 251 Kan. 527 - State v. Bailey

State v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably State v. Gleason (2004), State v. Gant (2009)

36 state decisions

220199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Penn v. Parke State Bank · State v. Goering · State v. Stallings · State v. Edwards · State v. Bailey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In sentencing a convicted felon, a second trial judge is not restricted to imposing a sentence no greater than the sentence another judge previously imposed upon a codefendant for the same crime. The second judge, however, must consider the sentence given to the codefendant and, if a longer sentence is given, the reason for doing so should be set forth on the record.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.