Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 251 Kan. 539 - Resolution Trust Corp. v. Bopp

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Bopp’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2019

16 state decisions

120199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · Honeycutt v. City of Wichita · State v. Craven · In re Hylton · Stauth v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A notice of appeal filed subsequent to an announcement by the judge of the district court on a judgment to be entered, but prior to the actual entry of judgment as provided in K.S.A. 60-258, shall be effective as a notice of appeal under K.S.A. 60-2103 if it identifies the judgment or part thereof from which the appeal is taken with sufficient certainty to inform all parties of the rulings to be reviewed on appeal. Such advance filing shall have the same effect for purposes of the appeal as if the notice of appeal had been filed simultaneously with the actual entry of judgment, provided it complies with K.S.A. 60-2103(b).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"Defendants have shown no prejudice resulting from the alleged premature filing of the notice of appeal. Considering the liberal construction to be given our procedural statutes and rules and the intent of our code of civil procedure and our appellate rules, we find no fatal jurisdictional defects and will proceed to determine the appeal on the merits. See K.S.A. 60-102 ; Supreme Court Rule 203 ( 230 Kan. xcix )." 233 Kan. at 939 -40 , 666 P.2d 1182 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he running of the time for appeal is terminated by a timely motion”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.