State v. Mayes’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably State v. Loh (1996), State v. Graves (1995)
50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Idaho v. Wright · 103 Wash. 2d 165 - State v. Ryan · Fulton v. Chouteau County Farmers' Co. · State v. Harris · State v. Austad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“46-16-503. Conduct of jury after retirement — advice from court.... (2) After the jury has retired for deliberation, if there is any disagreement among the jurors as to the testimony or if the jurors desire to be informed on any point of law arising in the cause, they shall notify the officer appointed to keep them together, who shall then notify the court. The information requested may be given, in the discretion of the court, after consultation with the parties.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson · State v. Graves“[T]he court should determine what particular testimony has caused the disagreement among the jurors. After making that determination, the court shall exercise its discretion after consultation with the parties, keeping in mind that the court must avoid undue emphasis upon particular testimony as condemned in State v. Harris.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson“the presence of corroborating evidence is not significant under that case for admission purposes. On the other hand, at a minimum the testimony does establish a basis for considering both declarants to be trustworthy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.