State v. Jelliff’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
1 district · 41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably State v. Micko (1986), State v. Mees (1978)
1 district · 41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dranow v. United States · Hughes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. · Bary v. United States · State v. Howe · State v. Lange
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"An appeal may be taken by the state from: . . . . . "4. An order made after judgment affecting any substantial right of the state. "5. An order granting the return of property or suppressing evidence, or suppressing a confession or admission, when accompanied by a statement of the prosecuting attorney asserting that the deprivation of the use of the property ordered to be returned or suppressed or of a confession or admission ordered to be suppressed has rendered the proof available to the state with respect to the criminal charge filed with the court, (1) insufficient as a matter of law, or (2) so weak in its entirety that any possibility of prosecuting such charge to a conviction has been effectively destroyed. The statement shall be filed with the clerk of district court and a copy thereof shall accompany the notice of appeal."”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage““1. ... a. the forbidden conduct; b. the attendant circumstances specified in the definition and grading of the offense; c. the required culpability; d. any required result; and e. the nonexistence of a defense as to which there is evidence in the case sufficient to give rise to a reasonable doubt on the issue.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bohl“We have held repeatedly that statutes must be construed to avoid ludicrous and absurd results.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ronngren
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.