Foreman v. Foreman’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 115 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 141 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably Torres v. $3625680 US Currency (1994), Worobey v. Sibieth (1949)
7 federal appellate · 115 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burns v. . McCormick · Sinclair v. . Purdy · Wood v. . Rabe · McKeon v. . Van Slyck · Goldsmith v. . Goldsmith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 141 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'unjust enrichment under cover of the relation of confidence.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ruiz v. Ruiz · Parks v. Tuffli
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.