Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

251 N.Y. 347

167 N.E 466

People v. Lyttle

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1929

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1929-07-11

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1929-07-11

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 1960

8 state decisions

6019291930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 So far as the record informs us, the game conducted by the defendant was one. involving a trial or test of skill, and not one dependent upon the drawing or choice of numbers. If the fact is otherwise, as the People’s brief-suggests, appropriate evidence should have been offered to bring the case within the statute.

¶2 Penal Law, section 974, permits a prosecution where the result of a wager is dependent on the selection of numbers, even though not strictly the game of policy, but in such circumstances the information should be framed upon that theory.

¶3 The judgment should be affirmed.

¶4 Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.

¶5 Judgment affirmed.

/251/ny/347 · .json · Public domain