Abrams v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
2 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2015
2 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Callanan v. . K., A.C. L.C.R.R. Co. · Vail v. . Reynolds · Weigel v. . Cook · Thomas v. Coultas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We read this contract as giving the plaintiff an absolute right to rescission. This was the thing contracted and stipulated for; the title was closed with this inducement and understanding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.