Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 251 P3D 1287 - Meyer v. Haskett

Meyer v. Haskett’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc. v. Colorado Water Conservation Board · Estate of Stevenson Ex Rel. Talovich v. Hollywood Bar & Cafe, Inc. · 33 Colo. App. 320 - Dudley v. Keller · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado v. Sharp · Peterson v. Halsted

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[LLCs] generally operate under an entity theory of property rights. Under this theory, a member has no interest in the property owned by the LLC.”) (citation omitted). Moreover, while Colorado law gives members a right to receive distributions from the LLC (unless its liabilities exceed its assets), that right is limited”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “upon all persons having an interest or title of record in or to the [subject property] if, upon diligent inquiry, the residence of such persons can be determined.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “it is only in the clearest of cases, where no doubt exists concerning the facts, that summary judgment is warranted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.