State v. Sanders’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2005
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Glasser v. United States · State v. . Litteral · State v. Hollman · State v. Steadman · State v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While the indiscriminate use of obsolete and inappropriate allegations in indictments is not approved, we find no prejudice to defendant in this case from the allegations that the offense was committed ‘with force and arms.’ The jury was properly instructed as to the elements of the offense charged and there is nothing to indicate that such allegations in any way affected the verdict.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““We have carefully reviewed the trial record in the light of the allegations contained in defendant’s petition. We find that the defendant was competently represented by his counsel and that defendant’s charges to the contrary are totally and completely without support in the record.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.