Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 251 So. 2d 287 - State v. Custer

251 So. 2d 287 - State v. Custer’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
June 1983
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Longo v. State · United States v. Goosbey · 223 So. 2d 52 - James v. State · 192 So. 2d 6 - Bretti v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A voluntary consent to search a given area cannot limit the fruits of a search thereof. Once consent was given to search the entire automobile any contraband found therein was subject to seizure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “that the search herein was purely and simply a classic `consent search,' and it was error to suppress the fruits thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.