Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

251 S.W. 813

Stutzman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1923-05-16

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1923-05-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 1940

1 district · 7 state decisions

60192319301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

LATTIMORE, J,

¶1Appellant was convicted in the district court of Kinney county of passing a forged instrument, and his punishment fixed at four years in the penitentiary.

¶2The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. The indictment sufficiently charged the passage of an instrument affecting a pecuniary obligation, and the charge of the court responded to the allegations in the indictment.

¶3There being no error ip the record, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

/251/sw/813 · .json · Public domain