Maynard v. Maynard’s Empirical Analysis
1952
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2018
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kelly v. Kelly · Garnett v. Oliver · Bobbitt v. Bobbitt · Campbell v. Campbell · Maynard v. Maynard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]n appeal does not necessarily deprive the lower court of all jurisdiction, so as to prevent absolutely any action, even though such action does not affect the matters involved on the appeal and exclusively committed to the reviewing court. On the contrary, the case is often regarded as pending in the court of original jurisdiction for the purposes of proceedings other than such as pertain to the subject-matter of the judgment itself, or to the appeal and the proper hearing thereof, and concerning collateral or incidental matters necessary for the preservation of the fruits of the ultimate judgment, or affecting the status in quo of the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brosnan v. Brosnan“We are ... faced first with the question of whether the trial court had the right to determine the collateral matter of allowance of an attorney’s fee after reversal and upon return of this case to the circuit court, or whether the circuit court was confined solely to consideration of the matters which were in issue on the appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brosnan v. Brosnan“We are of opinion that the original appeal in this case did not deprive the circuit court of jurisdiction of matters which were not involved on the appeal and which were collateral to the main issue in the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brosnan v. Brosnan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.