¶1 {dissenting). The purpose of sec. 85.19 (1), Stats., is to prevent unnecessary highway obstructions. Such bottlenecks constitute hazards which frequently result in accidents. Here the violation of the statute resulted in the very situation which the statute is intended to prevent. It may well be, as held in the majority opinion', that an intervening act of negligence was a cause of the accident. Be that as it may, the relationship of cause and effect existed between the violation of the statute and the accident. It was a contributing factor and therefore a cause. Mr. Justice Barlow joins with me in the view that the judgment should be affirmed.
251 Wis. 292
29 N.W.2d 31
Collar v. Meyer
Decided September 10, 1947
Wisconsin Supreme Court · decided 1947-09-10
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 2018
3 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1947-09-10
View the full empirical analysis of this case →