Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 252 Ala. 305 - Hendricks v. State

Hendricks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
March 1976
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 1976

17 state decisions

601949195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Randolph v. State · Wilkes v. Stacy Williams Co. · 15 Ala. App. 72 - Taylor v. State · Robison v. State · Templin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In considering the effect of this statute, together with § 389, Title 15, Code of 1940, which provides that the supreme court or court of appeals 'must render such judgment as the law demands,’ this Court in Robison v. State, 240 Ala. 638 , 200 So. 629 , in effect held that the Court of Appeals has the power to discharge the defendant but only when the ends of justice so demand in the light of the entire record. In Robison v. State, supra, this Court further held in effect that the power of the Court of Appeals to discharge is subject to the supervisory powers of this Court and should not be exercised merely from an insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the charge, unless the Court considers that further evidence to sustain the charge could not be adduced on another trial. See also Temlin v. State, 159 Ala. 128 , 48 So. 1027 . * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.