People v. Limon’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently January 2008
2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 50 Cal. 2d 75 - People v. Osslo · 63 Cal. 2d 74 - People v. Holford · People v. Odom · 24 Cal. App. 799 - People v. Diller · 194 Cal. App. 2d 527 - People v. Mayo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The various requirements of the statute are set forth in the conjunctive and omission to perform any one of the acts required constitutes an offense.” This statement was made ... to illustrate that, even though the defendant there did stop at the scene of the crime, he nevertheless was guilty of a violation of the statute by failing to comply with the other requirements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cerezo v. Mukasey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.