Taylor v. Fram’s Empirical Analysis
252 F. 465 · 1918
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 1959
6 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ludvigh v. American Woolen Co. · Southard v. . Benner · Hangen v. . Hachemeister · Ludvigh v. American Woolen Co. · Taylor v. Fram
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There are numerous eases which may be cited to show that such an agreement creates a bailment, and not a sale, and that the bail- or is at liberty at any time to retake his merchandise, irrespective of whether bankruptcy proceedings intervene or whether the debt- or is solvent or not. All this we concede, and no citation of authorities is necessary. “But the above doctrine only applies where the agreement is entered into in good faith, and without intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kaplan v. Clark
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.