Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 252 F.2d 372 - Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University & Agricultural & Mechanical College v. Arnease Ludley, Louisiana State Board of Education v. Alma Lark, Louisiana State Board of Education v. Jack Bailey

Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University & Agricultural & Mechanical College v. Arnease Ludley, Louisiana State Board of Education v. Alma Lark, Louisiana State Board of Education v. Jack Bailey’s Empirical Analysis

252 F.2d 372 · 1958

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
December 1991
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently December 1991 · most notably United States v. Wood (1961), Taylor v. Board of Education of the City School District of New Rochelle (1961)

24 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

23019581960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · Staub v. City of Baxley · Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co. · Davis v. Wechsler · Ex parte National Enameling & Stamping Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is apparent that the requirement for the appointment of a three judge court does not apply in litigation in which there can be no real dispute as to the question of constitutionality that is drawn in issue by the suit seeking the injunction. There can be no real dispute where each separate element on which the state relies to support the constitutionality of a statute has been clearly and definitely put at rest by the Supreme Court contrary to the contention of the state. Such is the case here.” 252 F.2d at 376 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Full relief can be obtained from the named defendants without requiring the State to take any affirmative action. This is the test.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.