Evans v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
252 F.2d 509 · 1958
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently March 1974 · most notably Keene v. United States (1959), Lockhart v. United States (1969)
33 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. · Falbovs v. United States · Gonzales v. United States · Macauley v. Waterman Steamship Corp. · United States v. Sing Tuck or King Do & Thirty-One
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“All prior classifications given appellant by either the local board or the appeal board were superseded by this last classification [citations omitted]; and the final classification had the effect of rendering harmless any errors committed in the earlier classifications [citation omitted]. Appellant had the right to appeal * * * but he took no appeal. Having thus failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, it would seem to follow that appellant could not attack his I-A classification when prosecuted for failure to obey induction made pursuant thereto.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.