Jimenez v. Barber’s Empirical Analysis
252 F.2d 550 · 1958
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably National Screen Service Corp. v. Poster Exchange, Inc. (1962), Dann v. Studebaker-Packard Corp. (1961)
34 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (§ 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Commonwealth of Virginia v. State of Maryland · Holzer v. United States · Jimenez v. Barber · Jimenez v. Barber
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“until the Board could act upon [the alien's motion to reopen]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“giv[e] [Legislative Defendants] the fruits of victory whether or not the appeal has merit,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.