Earl Rader v. J. Marvin Boyd’s Empirical Analysis
252 F.2d 585 · 1958
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently May 2011 · most notably Weinberger v. Kendrick (1982), Matter of WT Grant Co. (1980)
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pepper v. Litton · Heiser v. Woodruff · The Inter-State National Bank of Kansas City v. Frank Luther, Trustee, Matter of Garden Grain & Seed Company, Inc., Bankrupt · Luther v. United States · Central States Corp. v. Luther
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While fiducial or confidential relationships recognized and enforced in equity do not rest upon any particular legal relationship, they do necessarily spring from an attitude of trust and confidence and are based on some form of agreement, either express or implied, from which it can be said that the minds have met to create a mutual obligation. (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Werth“an arrangement which offers no more than a speculative venture with creditor's funds is not adequate protection for the secured creditors”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Parties may assuredly deal at arm's length for their mutual benefit without raising a confidential relationship between them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.