Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 252 F.2d 715 - Marquez v. Aviles

Marquez v. Aviles’s Empirical Analysis

252 F.2d 715 · 1958

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
March 2004
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2004

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

90195819601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1293 · 48 U.S.C. § 731D

Relies on Bolling v. Sharpe · McGee v. Ekberg · De Castro v. Board of Commissioners · Mora v. Mejias · Figueroa v. People of Puerto Rico

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Section 1. — All children born out of wedlock subsequent to the date this Act takes effect, shall be natural children, whether or not the parents could have married at the moment when such children were conceived. These children will be legitimized by the subsequent marriage of the parents, to each other. “Section 2. — Children born out of wedlock prior to the date this Act takes effect, and who lack the qualifications of natural children according to previous legislation, may be recognized for all legal purposes by the voluntary action of their parents, and in their default, by that of the persons having the right to inherit therefrom. These children will be legitimized by the subsequent marriage of the parents, to each other.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In the Report of the Bill of Rights Committee and in the debates of the Constitutional Convention it was made clear beyond any doubt that ‘for the purposes of inheritance and property, the changes resulting from this section (referring to the aforesaid Sec. 1 of the Bill of Rights) shall not be retroactive to, births occurring prior to its effectiveness.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““All children have, ivith respect to their - parents and to the estate left by the latter the same rights that correspond to legitimate children.” (Italics ours.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.