John Cavanaugh v. Charles J. Long

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Feb. 24, 1958.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1958-02-24

2 counsel of record

Relies on Cavanaugh v. McKenzie · Muckle v. Sword Line, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1958-02-24

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2007

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada; John R. Ross, Judge.

Grubic, Drendel & Bradley, William O. Bradley, Reno, Nev., for appellant.

Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Elizabeth Dudley, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Franklin P. R. Rittenhouse, U.S. Atty., Las Vegas, Nev., for appellee.

Before HEALY, LEMMON, and BARNES, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The judgment below is affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion and order of the trial judge on the motion to dismiss, Cavanaugh v. McKenzie, D.C., 159 F.Supp. 555.