Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 252 F.3d 1102 - Royal Foods Co. v. RJR Holdings Inc.

Royal Foods Co. v. RJR Holdings Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

252 F.3d 1102 · 2001

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably Environmental Defense Center, Inc. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.-Intervenor, v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2003), Silvers v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc. (2005)

15 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

320200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Malloy v. Hogan · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “strong presumption that the plain language of the statute expresses congressional intent, which is `rebutted only in rare and exceptional circumstances, when a contrary legislative intent is clearly expressed.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.