Galarza v. Keane’s Empirical Analysis
252 F.3d 630 · 2001
Citation profile
35 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably Overton v. Newton (2002), McKinney v. Artuz (2003)
35 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Olano · Batson v. Kentucky · Johnson v. Zerbst · Teague v. Lane · Stone v. Powell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a court must “make an ultimate determination on the issue of discriminatory intent based on all the facts and circumstances.” Galarza v. Keane, 252 F.3d 630, 636 (2d Cir.2001) (quoting Jordan v. Lefevre, 206 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir.2000) (internal quotation marks omitted)). “We have repeatedly emphasized that a trial court may not deny a Batson motion without determining whether it credits the race-neutral explanations for the challenged peremptory strikes.” Galarza, 252 F.3d at 636 . “The credibility of an attorney offering a race-neutral explanation is at the very heart of [the Batson ] analysis.” Barnes[ v. Anderson], 202 F.3d [150,] 157 [2d Cir.1999].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'denied.’ ” As noted ante, a trial judge is not obligated to provide "a talismanic recitation of specific words in order to satisfy Batson.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] party must raise his or her Batson challenges in a manner that would allow a trial court to remedy the problem at trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.