¶1 The attorney appointed to represent Asuncion Domingo Cobos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Cobos has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Cobos’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and *600 Cobos’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, Cobos’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
252 F. App'x 599
United States v. Cobos
U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided October 25, 2007
This page is marked noindex.
U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2007-10-25
Relies on Anders v. California · United States v. Cantwell
Decided 2007-10-25