Glover, Michael v. Haferman, Steven’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Erickson v. Pardus · Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. · Bobby J. Anderson v. Alfred Hardman · DeWalt v. Carter · Palmer v. Marion County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“holding that a claim that is not “clearly articulated in a complaint” cannot be advanced to survive a judgment, as a plaintiff’s pleadings must 'give the defendant fair notice of what the plaintiff's claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the district court did not err when it refrained from addressing the [plaintiff's] claim at summary judgment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.