Arco v. Ciccone’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Sanders v. United States · United States v. Hayman · Travis O. Spaulding v. J.C. Taylor, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary · Seelig v. United States · 203 F. Supp. 42 - Pavlick v. Settle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) motion for a determination that the petitioner is now mentally competent to understand the proceedings against him and properly to assist in his defense, and for a hearing on this issue; (2) motion for a speedy trial on the same grounds; (3) motion for an order to be returned to the committing court for a hearing on all motions filed and undetermined, asserting present competency as in (1) above; (4) motion to vacate the order of commitment on the ground that it was erroneously entered; (5) motion for appointment of counsel or direction to previously-appointed counsel to represent petitioner. See Arco v. Ciccone (W.D.Mo.) 252 F. Supp. 347 , affirmed (C.A. 8) 359 F.2d 796 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.