252 F. Supp. 2d 293 - Byrd v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2241 (Amber Hagerman Child Protection Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3621 · 18 U.S.C. § 3622 · 18 U.S.C. § 3624 · 18 U.S.C. § 3625 · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2243 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Bailey v. United States · Weaver v. Graham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“are able to leave under some limited circumstances as outlined by 18 U.S.C. § 3622, they are not free to come and go as they please. They are `imprisoned.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The public has an interest in prisoners rehabilitating themselves and their reputation in the community, if they are not a security risk. The public interest would be harmed by the Petitioners no longer being able to work and support their families. The public interest would be similarly injured by any violation of statutory or constitutional rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Colton v. Ashcroft“while continuing in official detention at the penal or correctional facility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Goldings v. Winn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.