Adkins v. Vilsack’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 7 U.S.C. § 1501 (Agricultural Risk Protection Act of 2000) · 7 U.S.C. § 1502 · 7 U.S.C. § 1506 · 7 U.S.C. § 1508 · 7 U.S.C. § 1508b · 7 U.S.C. § 6996
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Mead Corp. · Camp v. Pitts · Auer v. Robbins · Russello v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The administrative record reflects that the agency had much to do to prepare for the 2015 crop year, but that does not permit the Court to re-write the statute to permit the delay sought by the agency in this case. It is the role of Congress, not the courts, to write and enact statutory provisions. The Court's role is one of interpretation and enforcement, and in this instance, the Court [finds] legal error in the agency's decision with respect to the APH Yield Exclusion set out in § 1508(g)(4)(C).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ausmus v. Perdue“the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of an agency action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ausmus v. Perdue“effective immediately without the need of any type of implementing action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ausmus v. Perdue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.