Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 252 Ga. 142 - Redmond v. State

Redmond v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2009

8 state decisions

50198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hazelwood School District v. United States · Hicks v. State · Herring v. State · Lenear v. State · Lingerfelt v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where, as here, the name of a witness is contained in the indictment, a defendant cannot validly contend that he has been surprised or unable to interview the witness because he was unaware of such witness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.