Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 252 Ill. App. 3d 88 - People v. Durham

252 Ill. App. 3d 88 - People v. Durham’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2021

16 state decisions

801993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 106 Ill. 2d 237 - People v. Collins · 133 Ill. 2d 286 - People v. Pintos · 127 Ill. 2d 12 - People v. Jimerson · 89 Ill. 2d 322 - People v. Whitlow · 62 Ill. 2d 114 - People v. Weathers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]akes possession of, carries away, transfers or causes to be carried away or transferred any merchandise displayed, held, stored or offered for sale in a retail mercantile establishment with the intention of retaining such merchandise or with the intention of depriving the merchant permanently of the possession, use or benefit of such merchandise without paying the full retail value of such merchandise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “was carrying out some previously devised plan rather than taking advantage of an opportunity presented by the circumstances”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that of a shopper browsing through various racks and displays.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.