State v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably State v. Smith (1999), State v. McAdam (2004)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Lane v. Peterson · Anthony v. United States · United States v. Phillips · Chambers v. United States · Marino v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A conspiracy is an agreement with another person to commit a crime or to assist in committing a crime. No person may be convicted of a conspiracy unless an overt act in furtherance of such conspiracy is alleged and proved to have been committed by such person or by a co-conspirator."”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Butler · State v. King“' "(1) An agreement between two or more persons to commit or assist in committing a crime and (2) the commission by one or more of the conspirators of an overt act in furtherance of the object of the conspiracy.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. King · State v. Cottrell““ ‘Overt act. An open, manifest act from which criminality maybe implied. An outward act done in pursuance and manifestation of an intent or design. An open act, which must be manifestly proved. “ ‘An overt act which completes crime of conspiracy to violate federal law is something apart from conspiracy and is an act to effect the object of the conspiracy, and need be neither a criminal act, nor crime that is object of conspiracy, but must accompany or follow agreement and must be done in furtherance of object of agreement. Marino v. United. States, C.C.A.Cal., 91 F.2d 691 , 694, 695.’ ” (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1104 [6th ed. 1990]).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.