Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 252 Kan. 883 - State v. Bowman

State v. Bowman’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

2 district · 48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably State v. Moncla (1997), State v. Sanders (1995)

2 district · 48 state decisions

3701993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Sutherland · State v. Boos · State v. Patterson · In re Fleming · State v. Keeler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In cases where the crime charged may include some lesser crime, it is the duty of the trial court to instruct the jury, not only as to the crime charged but as to all lesser crimes of which the accused might be found guilty under the information or indictment and upon the evidence adduced.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““An included crime may be any of the following: (a) A lesser degree of the same crime; (b) an attempt to commit the crime charged; (c) an attempt to commit a lesser degree of the crime charged; or (d) a crime necessarily proved if the crime charged were proved.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “does not arise unless there is evidence supporting the lesser offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.