Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

252 La. 707

State v. Hampton

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 24, 1968

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1968-09-24

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1969

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1968-09-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In re: Eunice Hampton applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

¶2The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

¶3It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Matthew S. Braniff, Judge of the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 19th day of December, 1968, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

¶4It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through its attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

HAMITER and BARHAM!, JJ., are of the opinion that applicant’s remedy is, and she is entitled to, an appeal. See Art. 912 Code of Crim.Proc.
/252/la/707 · .json · Public domain