Kandel v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mooney (2000), In Re Yengo (1980)
2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on White v. California · Chula v. Superior Court · International Workers Order, Inc. v. New York ex rel. Bohlinger · Arthur v. Superior Court · Lyons v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]here a direct contempt is committed, the court shall sign a written order to that effect. The order shall recite the facts, be signed by the judge and entered of record. The order shall state which of the facts were known to the court of its own knowledge and as to any facts not so known, the basis for the court’s finding with respect thereto.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Usiak v. State“[u]njustified failure of an attorney to appear in court on time is at least misbehavior on the part of an officer of the court.” Id. at 671, 250 A.2d at 854 . In reviewing Mr. Kandel’s contempt conviction the Court noted that in such cases”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“"Appellant clearly was not denied due process. He was given the opportunity at the time the fine was imposed to present exculpatory reasons for his tardiness, and attempted to do so.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.