252 Mich. App. 269 - People v. Kimble’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2009
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Olano · Lockhart v. Fretwell · Glover v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“defendant and his accomplices drove around for an hour, looking for a car to steal so they could remove and sell the wheel rims.... [W]hen [they] saw the victim driving a car with valuable rims, they followed the victim home, watched the victim pull into the driveway, and shot the victim in order to steal the car.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Russell“[d]efendant's preoffense behavior in seeking out a victim and following this victim home for the specific purpose of committing a crime against her was clearly predatory within the meaning of the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Russell“for the primary purpose of victimization.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Cannon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.