Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 252 MO 53 - Bridges v. Holdout Mining Co.

Bridges v. Holdout Mining Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 1932
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 1932

7 state decisions

50191319201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Kinsey v. Messerly · Hays v. C. C. & H. Mining & Milling Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In all other cases where a general law can be made applicable, no local or special law shall be enacted; and whether a general law could have been made applicable in any case is hereby declared a judicial question, and as such shall be judicially determined, without regard to any legislative assertion on that subject;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.