Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

252 N.C. 121

113 S.E.2d 15

State v. Holder

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1960

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1960-03-02

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 1978

14 state decisions

Relies on State v. Adams

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1960-03-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER Curiam.

¶1 The defendant asked for a new trial solely upon the ground that the court committed error in recapitulating the defendant’s evidence and contentions and that he was prejudiced by the reference to the treatment of alcoholism.

¶2 Inadvertence in stating the contentions or in recapitulating the evidence must be called to the attention of the court in time for correction. After verdict the objection' comes too late. State v. Adams, 245 N.C. 344, 95 S.E. 2d 902.

¶3 No error.

/252/nc/121 · .json · Public domain