Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 252 NW2D 326 - Kary v. Arnold

Kary v. Arnold’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1997
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Estate of Hobelsberger · Dusek v. Reese

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Rescission of a contract is not generally permitted for a casual, technical, or unimportant breach or failure of performance, but only for a breach so substantial as to tend to defeat the very object of the contract. The same principle applies to rescission based upon partial failure of consideration under our statute. Such a breach must also be substantial or relate to a material part of the contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.