Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 252 NW2D 861 - State v. Lueder

State v. Lueder’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2006

7 state decisions

201977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Green v. United States · United States v. Jorn · Kent v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““a. That the conviction or the sentence was in violation of the constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States or the constitution or laws of this state; b. That the court was without jurisdiction to impose sentence; c. That the sentence exceeds the maximum authorized by law; d. That there exists evidence of material facts, not previously presented and heard, that requires vacation of the conviction or sentence in the interest of justice; e. That his sentence has expired, that his probation, parole, or conditional release has been unlawfully revoked, or that he is otherwise unlawfully held in custody or other restraint; or f.That the conviction or sentence is otherwise subject to collateral attack upon any ground of alleged error heretofore available under any common law, statutory or other writ, motion, petition, proceeding, or remedy”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.