¶1The appellant was charged with the crime of robbery.
¶2He entered a plea of not guilty and waived jury trial. Upon trial he was found guilty as charged and sentenced to a term of ten years in the penitentiary. Appellant seeks reversal of the judgment and sentence on the ground that the trial court erred in permitting in court identification based upon illegal photographic confrontation.
¶3After carefully reviewing the record, considering the briefs and argument of counsel, we have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. Therefore the judgment appealed is affirmed.
¶4Affirmed.
¶5(concurring).
¶6I concur in the majority opinion for the further reason that the constitutional question was not adequately preserved by appropriate objection at the time of trial. See: Robertson v. State, 94 Fla. 770, 114 So. 534; Fraterrigo v. State, 151 Fla. 634, 10 So.2d 361; Tennant v. State, Fla.App.1967, 205 So.2d 324; Koran v. State, Fla.App.1968, 213 So.2d 735.