Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 252 So. 2d 361 - Johnson v. State

252 So. 2d 361 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2007
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2007

5 state decisions

301971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pinder v. State · 47 So. 2d 308 - Foreman v. State · 194 So. 2d 313 - Boim v. State · Tootle v. State · Salters v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it appears from the whole record that the jury could not have been misled by the instructions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.