Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 252 SO3D 67 - Locklear Auto. Grp., Inc. v. Hubbard

Locklear Auto. Grp., Inc. v. Hubbard’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act)

Relies on At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Casarotto · Andrews v. Merritt Oil Co., Inc. · United States v. Alpert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “clearly and explicitly argued to the trial court [at the hearing on the motion to compel arbitration] that there was an arbitrability clause in the arbitration agreement and that the import of the clause was that the issue whether [the appellee's] claims were covered by the arbitration agreement was for the arbitrator to decide, not the trial court. Therefore, the effect of the arbitrability clause is properly before us in this appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.